Revision Notes
Dear Ph.D. Jacob Huang,
Thank you for your letter and for the reviewer’s comments concerning our manuscript entitled "文章题目" (ID: MLBLUE-D-13-00***).
We have studied comments carefully and have made correction which we hope meet with approval. Revised portion are marked in red in the paper. The main corrections in the paper and the responds to the reviewer’s commentsare described below.
Thanks again for your time and letter.
Yours sincerely,
作者
Dear reviewer,
We would like to express our sincere appreciation for your careful reading and helpful comments. Those comments are all valuable and very helpful for revising and improving our paper, as well as the important guiding significance to our researches. We have addressed the points noted below without lengthening the paper.
Responses to Reviewer #1:
[Comment 1]The authors should provide error bars for the measurements reported in Fig. 1.
[Answer] We have added error bars in Fig. 2a.(Line 76)
[Comment 2]Was there any creep strain in the samples after aging for 1 h at the various temperatures?
[Answer]We have measured dimensional changes of the samples during the aging treatment with a micrometer. (Line 66-67)
[Comment 3] Perhaps more than minor editing for English, but not extensive.
[Answer]we have improved the English writting in the revised manuscript.(Line 25, 29, 80, etc.)
In all, we found your comments are quite helpful. And we believe that your suggestions will be a new subject for future work.